Chapter 7 Category Archives — Page 4 of 5 — Securities Fraud Lawyers Blog Published by Securities Fraud Attorneys

5 things that a bankruptcy trustee wants you to produce before your 341 meeting.

Published on: March 15, 2015 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

In a previous blog post, I explained the purpose of a 341 meeting of creditors. A trustee holds a 341 meeting in every bankruptcy case. You can access that blog post HERE. Before a 341 meeting, a bankruptcy trustee usually requests certain documents to verify the information provided in the bankruptcy petition and schedules. Without the production of this information, a trustee may reschedule or adjourn the meeting until the documents are provided. Below are 5 things that a bankruptcy often requests to review at least one week before the 341 meeting.

1. Tax returns for the last two years.

Proposed Amended and New Local Rules for Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida, for 2015

Published on: March 10, 2015 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, Esquire, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

The judges of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida are considering new rules and proposed amendments to the Local Rules. The proposals are available HERE for public comment beginning on March 9, 2015. The public comment period ends on April 24, 2015. When promulgated by the judges, the amended and new Local Rules will become effective on July 1, 2015.
While many proposed changes are stylistic, some of the proposals will affect daily bankruptcy practice. For instance, one proposed amendment reduces the time during which Electronic Filing Users must retain paper copies bearing original signatures from four years to two years. One new rule requires subpoenas before trial to be filed with the Court in addition to being served on each party to the adversary proceeding or contested matter. Another change involves amendments to lists and schedules. The amendment requires that the Notice of Deadline to File Proof of Claim, if any, be served upon newly added creditors in amended Schedules D, E and F.

What is a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and how is it different from a Chapter 7 case?

Published on: February 7, 2015 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

Only an individual (not businesses) with regular income can seek relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. Chapter 13 allows individuals with regular income to propose a plan to repay all or part of their debts. Under Chapter 13, individuals file a proposed repayment plan to pay installments to their creditors over three to five years. If the individual’s monthly income is less than the applicable state median (see U.S. Trustee website, State Median Family Income by Family Size), the plan will last for only three years unless there is “cause” for additional time needed. If the individual’s current monthly income is more than the median, the proposed plan generally must be for five years. Courts will not allow plan periods of over five years. 11 U.S.C. §1322(d). During the plan period, creditors cannot start or continue collection efforts.

There are certain advantages in Chapter 13 over liquidation in a Chapter 7 case. One of the most significant advantages, Chapter 13 offers individuals an opportunity to save their homes from foreclosure. Individuals can stop foreclosure proceedings and may cure delinquent mortgage payments over time. That said, individuals must still make all monthly mortgage payments on time during the Chapter 13 plan. Another advantage is that Chapter 13 allows individuals to reschedule secured debts (other than a mortgage for their primary residence) and extend them over the life of the chapter 13 plan. Doing this may lower the payments. Chapter 13 also may protect third parties who are liable with the debtor on “consumer debts,” specifically co-signers or guarantors. Last, in Chapter 13, the individual makes plan payments to a Chapter 13 trustee who then distributes payments to creditors. Individuals do not have direct contact with creditors while under Chapter 13.

Can an employer terminate your employment because you filed bankruptcy?

Published on: January 17, 2015 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, Esquire, with Savage, Combs, & Villoch, PLLC

No. An employer is strictly prohibited from terminating your employment or discriminating against you in any way solely because you filed bankruptcy. Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code is entitled “Protection against discriminatory treatment.” Subsection (b) specifically states that no private employer may terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, an individual who filed bankruptcy simply because he or she filed bankruptcy.

Similarly, if your employment requires a license or permit, for example, a doctor, nurse, lawyer, or financial adviser, the governmental unit that issues such license or permit cannot deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew such license or permit simply because you filed bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. § 525(a). By way of further example, a state medical licensing board cannot revoke a doctor’s license to practice medicine simple because the doctor filed bankruptcy.

A brief history of bankruptcy in the United States.

Published on: December 21, 2014 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

Contrary to pop culture belief, bankruptcy existed long before the game show Wheel of Fortune. Remember when contestants would lose their prize money if they spun the wheel and randomly landed on the ominous black wedge, “BANKRUPTCY”? Bankruptcy also existed way before celebrities like M.C. Hammer, Billy Joel, Burt Reynolds, and Mike Tyson each filed for bankruptcy protection. P.T. Barnum, a famous American showman and businessman, filed bankruptcy in 1877. K-Mart filed bankruptcy in 2002.

Bankruptcy in the United States dates back to the United States Constitution itself. Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to enact uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies. Although Congress had this power beginning in 1787, Congress did not pass a bankruptcy law until about 13 years later in 1800 and, even then, the law passed was short lived and was limited to involuntary bankruptcy proceedings brought against merchant and traders. In 1803, Congress repealed the Bankruptcy Act of 1800, citing excessive costs and corruption.

"Debts canceled by bankruptcy still mar consumer credit scores," but consumers can fight back.

Published on: November 29, 2014 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

On November 12, 2014, the New York Times published an article entitled “Debts canceled by bankruptcy still mar consumer credit scores.” In the article, the author, Jessica Silver-Greenberg, explains that “Tens of thousands of Americans who went through bankruptcy are still haunted by debts long after — sometimes as long as a decade after — federal judges have extinguished the bills in court.” This article was also featured in the Tampa Bay Times on Friday, November 21, 2014.

Lawyers with the United States Trustee Program, a group charged with overseeing federal bankruptcy cases, are investigating certain banks, such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Synchrony Financial (f/k/a GE Capital Retail Finance), because these banks are suspected of violating bankruptcy law and ignoring the discharge injunction. Section 524 of the bankruptcy code provides a “discharge injunction” where creditors are no longer allowed to pursue debts canceled or discharged in the bankruptcy case. The banks allegedly ignore the discharge injunction when they know (or should have known) the debt was canceled but still seek to collect the debt, whether by continuing to report it on the person’s credit report, sending letters, or making telephone calls about the canceled debt. Often times, these are not clerical errors, but debt-collection tactics. In some cases, the banks purportedly refuse to correct the “mistakes,” insisting that the canceled debt be paid. An example cited in the article was The Vogts, a couple in Denver, who paid JPMorgan $2,582 on a debt that was discharged in bankruptcy because they needed a clean credit report to get a mortgage.

U.S. Supreme Court to review Eleventh Circuit ruling where Chapter 7 debtors are allowed to strip off second mortgages

Published on: November 24, 2014 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, Esquire, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

On November 17, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari in two cases: Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett (In re Caulkett), 566 Fed. Appx. 879, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9407 (11th Cir. Fla., 2014) and Bank of Am., NA v. Toledo-Cardona (In re Toledo-Cardona), 556 Fed. Appx. 911, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9035 (11th Cir. Fla., 2014). In both cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that a Chapter 7 debtor could strip off a second mortgage when the home’s value fell below the amount owed on the first mortgage.

What that ruling means is, if you file bankruptcy and the second mortgage on your home is completely “underwater,” like many second mortgages after the recent housing bust, then you could keep your house subject to the first mortgage and strip off the second mortgage completely leaving the debt secured by that second mortgage to be discharged in the bankruptcy. In the Toledo-Cardona case, the debtor kept his home and stripped off the second mortgage that had a value of over $100,000.00. That is why Bank of America and other lenders are not pleased with the decision.

I haven’t been able to pay my bills. Could I lose my car?

Published on: October 19, 2014 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

If you miss car payments, the company that loaned you the money to purchase the car can likely take back your car in what is called “repossession.” The right to take back your car for nonpayment usually comes from the terms of the signed loan paperwork when you buy your car. Usually, a few missed payments and the loan company will start calling you and sending you warning letters. Warning calls and letters will ultimately lead to repossession. Once the loan company repossesses, it can then sell your car at an auction and apply that money to pay down the amount that you still owe. This can also happen with car title loans (e.g., where you receive a loan and agree to give the loan company your car title as security and part of your promise to pay back the loan. This is called a security interest). In situations where the car is part of your promise to pay back a loan, the answer is “yes”: you could lose your car if you don’t make your car payments. Bankruptcy can immediately stop this process.

If you haven’t paid other bills, like a credit card or a payday loan, you could still lose your car, but the situation is a bit different and the company must take a few extra steps. For example, the company must first sue you to get a judgment in court. With a judgment in hand, the company can then apply to the court to have the sheriff take your car and sell it. This process is similar to repossession and is called a writ of attachment. The company would then use the money from the sale of your car as payment down on the amount that you owe. Bankruptcy can immediately stop this process too.

Is a bad faith action still viable when an insured defendant files bankruptcy?

Published on: October 15, 2014 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

Johnny Smith accidentally runs a red traffic light and slams his pick-up truck into a motorcyclist, Drew Lenders. Sadly, Drew was not wearing a helmet and suffered significant head trauma and memory loss. Drew’s hospital bill alone is $50,000 He also missed 3 months from work and, therefore, lost about $12,000 in wages. Drew hires an injury attorney and formally demands the $50,000 policy limits from Johnny’s auto insurance, ABC Insurance Co., within 30 days. But believing that the motorcyclist should have been wearing a helmet, ABC Insurance allows Drew’s demand to expire and, instead, hires a biomechanical engineer to find out if Drew’s injuries would have been prevented had he worn a helmet. Meanwhile, Johnny files bankruptcy.

One year later, a jury awards $200,000 verdict against Johnny and in favor of Drew. ABC Insurance pays the $50,000. Because Johnny is not responsible for an excess judgment by virtue of his prior bankruptcy, is a bad faith claim against ABC Insurance even a viable cause of action? The answer is “yes.”

So far in 2014, consumer bankruptcy filings are down 12 percent nationwide.

Published on: October 9, 2014 | by Savage Villoch Law, PLLC

By Alfred Villoch, III, Esquire, with Savage, Combs & Villoch, PLLC

Consumer bankruptcy filings are down 12 percent so far in 2014, according to Epiq Systems, Inc., and as reported by the American Bankruptcy Institute. See “Bankruptcy Filings Through First Three Quarters of 2014 Fall 12 Percent from 2013, Commercial Filings Fall 22 Percent.” The total consumer filings nationwide this year are 705,452. Commercials filings are down 22 percent over the same period. The total commercial filings are 26,767.

The top bankruptcy-filing states per capita are Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Utah, and Indiana. Surprisingly, Florida is not in the top 5.