Posts Tagged ‘securities fraud’

Madoff ‘Feeder Funds’ Suing Mad – And Playing Offensive Defense

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Now more ‘feeder fund’ investors are suing Madoff along with others.  These two feeder funds are looking to recoup approximately $3.5 billion in alleged losses.  Kingate Global Fund Ltd. and Kingate Euro Fund Ltd. filed their lawsuit in US District Court in Manhattan this week.

The lawsuit alleges that “[r]eportedly, over $3 billion was invested in Kingate Global and Kingate Euro, and virtually all of those moneys were funneled to Madoff.”  A few months ago these two Kingate funds were sued by the trustee of Madoff’s investment company.  The trusteee, Irving Picard sued to recover $255 million withdrawn from Madoff’s firm between October and November 2008.  Picard’s lawsuit named fund manager Kingate Management Ltd.; Grosso’s FIM Advisers LLP, which acted as a consultant to the funds; and others as defendants.

The feeder fund lawsuit is an attempt to deflect the allegations made by the Madoff investment firm trustee Irving Picard that these two funds illegally profited from their association with Madoff.

The feeder funds will try to defend by saying they were victims too.

Time will tell, but if these money managers are half as astute as they (used to) like the public to believe I am not sure they will make a strong case.

Connecticut AG Investigates Foul Play in Foreclosure Law Firms

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Connecticut AG Richard Blumenthal has asked Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (along with other organizations) why only a couple of law firms in Connecticut are handling foreclosures.  In a June 4th letter to the companies that were suspect, Mr. Blumenthal had reason to believe that consumers were being charged excessive fees on foreclosure actions and that marshals were being charged extensively in connection to the foreclosures.

In a statement Blumenthal said:

“Dominance over foreclosure service by a few select law firms and marshals has spurred complaints about improper or illegal practices: wrongfully allocating work to non-marshals, forging papers, failing to serve papers, and making kickbacks..A scarce few are spinning foreclosures into fortunes, and perhaps deepening homeowner despair.”

This is a story we will be hearing about in other states as well.  When one or two firms control huge portions of an industry that is called competition, wait, it is called oligopoly…not the best thing in these trying times.

For more on the story…click here.

New York AG’s Debt Collection Industry Investigation Will Hopefully Increase Accountability

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo closed down two debt collection companies in Western New York.  The two Buffalo-based firms engaged in a variety of illegal activities to achieve their ends, through various forms of harassment. The Attorney General’s office have delivered subpoenas to over 15 collection agencies due to complaints received in the wake of this investigation.

Debt Collection agencies that engage in illegal means of collection often use coercion and harassment to collect money that sometimes a customer might not even owe.  These two Buffalo firms, for example, allegedly forced individuals to pay debts that they didn’t even owe.

This issue has achieved nationwide importance, as the Federal Trade Commission has received three times the amount of complaints regarding debt collection agencies in 2008 in comparison to 2002.  There is no doubt that this investigation will lead to the downfall of more debt collection agencies that engage in illegal means to collect.

Tough business this debt collection – significant rules about their activities, serious penalties if they get it wrong.  I am sure that most are on the up and up and are aware of the costs of dropping the ball.  As in any industry, a few bad apples can ruin the whole thing.  The bad ones should be shut down but the good ones do provide a valuable service.

For more on this investigation…click here.

Stanford Group’s Chief Investment Officer Indicted

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Well, another supposedly strong and trustworthy company is being revealed as a ponzi scheme. This one ‘only’ involved about $8 billion and she was ‘only’ indicted for conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Is it just me or does it seem like the ones you should be able to trust in the financial markets you can’t trust.

Danny Pang’s Charges

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The SEC charged Pang with structuring charges for his scheme to make many transactions just below federal reporting requirements to gain access to huge sums of money without telling the government.  Apparently kept the cash at his house until he bought gold bars with it (really!).  The SEC is also alleging that he ran a huge ponzi scheme.