<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[investment banking - Savage Villoch Law]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/tags/investment-banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/tags/investment-banking/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Savage Villoch Law's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 17:43:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[In Wells Fargo Accounts Fraud Case, the Hits Keep Coming]]></title>
                <link>https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/wells-fargo-accounts-fraud/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/wells-fargo-accounts-fraud/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage Villoch Law, PLLC]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 14:00:23 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[33602]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[accounts fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[banking fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[business litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[financial fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment banking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment-loss recovery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[protecting your investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[tampa]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>We all remember that nastiness about Wells Fargo, right? You know, that little PR debacle where it turned out that, due to unrealistic sales initiatives, Wells Fargo employees initiated accounts fraud against millions of consumers. After the story broke, Wells Fargo lost a major vote of consumer confidence. The following weeks saw many customers closing&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>We all remember that nastiness about Wells Fargo, right? You know, that little PR debacle where it turned out that, due to unrealistic sales initiatives, <a href="http://54d.d17.myftpupload.com/blog/wells-fargo-pays-false-accounts-claim/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Wells Fargo employees initiated accounts fraud against millions of consumers</a>.
After the story broke, Wells Fargo lost a major vote of consumer confidence. The following weeks saw many customers closing accounts and executives getting raked over the coals, culminating in the resignation of the CEO and a large scale termination of employees who had participated in accounts fraud.
Finally, it seemed the dust had settled. The banking giant was ordered to pay out $190 million in federal fines and reparations to affected consumers. The bank also promised a change to corporate culture and initiatives, <a href="http://54d.d17.myftpupload.com/blog/wells-fargo-fraud-update/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">announcing an end to aggressive sales goals.</a>
</p>


<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>More Than Previously Expected</strong></h4>


<p>
Now it looks like it’s going to take a lot more than they thought. According to a recent <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/wells-fargo-accounts-idUSL1N1IF00H" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Reuters report</a>, the number of individuals affected by the accounts fraud scandal is far more than previously expected. In fact, it’s nearly double the initial figure.
What was once nearly 2 million unauthorized account creations has now ballooned into 3.5 million.
While the recent estimate is based on new case discoveries and hearings, Wells Fargo attorneys claim that it is largely “hypothetical” and “unverified”. Attorneys representing plaintiffs concur that it may be “over-inclusive”, but that the estimation provides a reasonable base for total compensation to plaintiffs.
</p>


<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Can a Settlement Be Reached?</strong></h4>


<p>
Understandably, Wells Fargo has been keen to settle the matter. The big bank’s attorneys have already increased its initial settlement figures from $110 million to $142 million to account for more-than-expected numbers of affected accounts.
</p>


<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Preventing Future Accounts Fraud</strong></h4>


<p>
The best method of preventing becoming a victim to accounts fraud is through awareness and education. Don’t be intimidated by big banks. You have the right to financial security. Make sure you regularly review all current accounts and monthly statements with any financial institution.
You can follow our blog to stay up to date on <a href="http://54d.d17.myftpupload.com/category/blog/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">legal tips, news and insights</a>. Contact us with any <a href="http://54d.d17.myftpupload.com/contact/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">legal questions or concerns regarding you financial security</a>.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[SEC Gets a Hand in Brokerage Oversight]]></title>
                <link>https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/brokerage-oversight/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/brokerage-oversight/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage Villoch Law, PLLC]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[broker-dealer oversight]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[brokerage oversight]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[financial adviser]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[financial regulation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment banking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[securities fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[trade reporting]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Brokerage oversight is getting a fresh pair of eyes This week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) indicated that it would be calling on a need for more oversight from its financial regulation partner, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). The decision to shift responsibility comes with an SEC initiative to devote more energies towards&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Brokerage oversight is getting a fresh pair of eyes</h5>


<p>
This week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) indicated that it would be calling on a need for more oversight from its financial regulation partner, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
The decision to shift responsibility comes with an SEC initiative to devote more energies towards the rise of independent financial advisers.
New business models offering greater independence and variety of investment services have led to an increase in the registration of investment advisers.
Since this increase, the SEC has been criticized for lack of oversight, managing to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/sec-regulations-finra-idUSL1N1CN1BU" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">examine only 10 percent of new investment adviser registrations per yea</a><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/sec-regulations-finra-idUSL1N1CN1BU" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">r</a>.
The SEC is increasing their investment adviser oversight an extra 20 percent to meet the growing number of independent advisement services.
As the SEC’s new focus will take examiners away from the Wall Street sector, it says it will need FINRA to step up their efforts to brokerage oversight.
While the SEC won’t be entirely removed from brokerage oversight, FINRA seems to be handling the shift well.
On Tuesday, Reuters reported that FINRA had fined Bank of America’s Merrill Lynch <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bank-of-america-wealth-finra-idUSL1N1CO15J" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">$2.8 million for record-keeping and trade reporting violations</a>.
FINRA is an independent, financial regulatory organization. It is a privately-funded organization but it seems committed to it’s self-regulatory purpose.
In regards to the Merrill Lynch fine, FINRA head of market regulation reiterated that accuracy of information reported by broker-dealers was critical for market integrity, according to the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bank-of-america-wealth-finra-idUSL1N1CO15J" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Reuters report</a>.
Regardless, the SEC wants to ensure that brokerage oversight will remain a priority.
They will be keeping regulators focused on brokerage oversight in New York and Chicago, two of the largest brokerage sectors.
They will also be overseeing FINRA’s efforts.
Reuters reports that a group named <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/sec-regulations-finra-idUSL1N1CN1BU" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">FINRA and Securities Industry Oversight</a> will monitor FINRA’s brokerage oversight examiners from offices in various major U.S. market sectors.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley Ethical Conduct in Question]]></title>
                <link>https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/morgan-stanley-ethics-concerns/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/morgan-stanley-ethics-concerns/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage Villoch Law, PLLC]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:42:01 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[accounts fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[banking ethics]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[big banking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[financial oversight]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[financial regulation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Hillsborough County]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment banking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment-loss protection]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment-loss recovery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[securities-based loans]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[tampa]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Bad Week for Big Banks Some of the nation’s top banks are facing another bad week, legally and financially as they are subjected to increased scrutiny and demand for reparations from federal regulators. Wells Fargo faces a continued inquest into the extent of its accounts fraud scandal as regional and municipal governments, including Hillsborough County,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Bad Week for Big Banks</h5>


<p>
Some of the nation’s top banks are facing another bad week, legally and financially as they are subjected to increased scrutiny and demand for reparations from federal regulators.
Wells Fargo faces a continued inquest into the extent of its <a href="http://54d.d17.myftpupload.com/blog/wells-fargo-pays-false-accounts-claim/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">accounts fraud scandal</a> as regional and municipal governments, including Hillsborough County, look further into their interests     with the banking giant.
A top financial regulator in Massachusetts is now charging Morgan Stanley with unethical conduct following a claim of a sales contest among Morgan Stanley brokers pushing securities-backed loans onto clients.
Additionally, German banking giant Deutsche Bank is facing slipping stocks and credibility as it struggles to reach a conclusion with U.S. courts over an up to $14 billion fine for mis-selling mortgage-backed securities, according to a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-deutsche-bank-idUSKCN1220NA" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">report</a> from Reuters. The report states that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-deutsche-bank-idUSKCN1220NA" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Deutsche Bank’s U.S. stock-holdings fell about 2.8 percent</a>.
</p>


<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Déja Vu with Morgan Stanley?</h5>


<p>
Though Morgan Stanley vehemently denies the charges put forth by William Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth, that the company is guilty of unethical conduct, it does not deny the existence of the sales contest.
The contest involved cross-selling banking products, mostly securties-based loans, to Morgan Stanley’s brokerage clients. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/morganstanley-massachusetts-idUSL2N1C9111" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Glavin’s claim</a> asserts that this cultivated a “high pressure” environment to meet contest goals that was against Morgan Stanley’s corporate policy.
Morgan Stanley did suspend the contest after the contest was discovered to be inconsistent with corporate policies, but maintain that no accounts were opened without customer understanding and consent.
</p>


<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Tensions Running High</h5>


<p>
Public opinion and federal regulators are taking a vigorous and critical look at big banking tactics following the Wells Fargo scandal. With the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis still looming in the economy’s rear-view, regulators and banking customers raise concerns over fundamental flaws in ethical banking procedures and continue to examine banks’ financial interests.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[CFPB Database Reveals Wolves of Wall Street]]></title>
                <link>https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/wolves-of-wall-street/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.savagelaw.us/blog/wolves-of-wall-street/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage Villoch Law, PLLC]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[financial abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[investment banking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[savings yields]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Jordan Belfort may have bestowed the title ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ on himself, but we all know that wolves travel in packs – and it looks like Wall Street is full of them. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) a financial watch-dog group has recently released a database outlining complaints against several of the nation’s&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>Jordan Belfort may have bestowed the title ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ on himself, but we all know that wolves travel in packs – and it looks like Wall Street is full of them. The <a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/consumer-complaints/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)</a> a financial watch-dog group has recently released a <a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/consumer-complaints/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">database</a> outlining complaints against several of the nation’s top banking and investment groups. The database, which focuses heavily on Wall Street stalwarts, including Citibank (part of Citigroup) and Chase (of JPMorgan Chase), is chock full of consumer complaints against these financial giants in regards to predatory banking tactics.
By navigating a simple search by name of any number of these banks, consumers can find mass-stores of complaints lodged against them, most stemming from the 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act.
Instituted in 1933, the Glass-Steagell Act served to prevent banks holding insured deposits from affiliating with investment banks and brokerage firms on Wall Street. The Glass-Steagall Act protected consumers from falling prey to stock fraud and financial abuse from these entities. Under pressure from large Wall Street firms, such as Citigroup, the Act was repealed under the Clinton Administration, ushering in a new era of gross misconduct and financial abuse on an unwitting public and laying the groundwork for the eventual economic crash in 2008.
The newly formed “financial supermarkets” exercised their power by enforcing strict, sub-prime credit interest rates, while severely limiting the capacity of consumers to generate interest yields on investments, savings and CD’s. One <a href="https://data.consumerfinance.gov/dataset/Consumer-Complaints/s6ew-h6mp" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">complaint</a> pulled from the CFPB database, dated Aug. 20, 2016, states that Citibank increased the annual percentage rate to 29.99% whereas a <a href="https://online.citi.com/US/JRS/pands/detail.do?ID=CurrentRates" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">recent search of Citibank’s interest-bearing savings accounts</a> show an interest rate accrual of only 0.01% for accounts under $10,000.
It is apparent that these mega-firms have not heeded the lessons of the 2008 crash and, if left unchecked, will continue to target the public for their own advantage. This election season, Republicans and Democrats have made it a bipartisan effort to ensure that these kinds of atrocities are stopped, with both parties pushing for the reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>