“Do no harm”

The phrasing Dudley used in asking Congress to preserve key regulations underscores the imperatives of the measures he his trying to preserve. Many of the core financial regulations in place today are a direct result of the 2008 crisis – which was itself a direct result of lack of sufficient regulation and oversight. The effects of the financial crisis were far-reaching and deep. We all experienced the negative effects and there are still people trying to recover what they’ve lost. It’s been a slow climb back to stable levels, but our economy is rebounding and investor activity is healthy; in fact, Wall Street indices have reached record highs over the last year. A return to normalcy could not have been achieved without the financial regulations put in place following the crash. While it seems that a review and potential overhaul of current measures is likely, eliminating the regulations that have helped us recover would not only be unwise, but could actually cause real harm to our economy. Fed experts also warn that financial deregulation can be a slippery slope, leading to massive unwinding of protective measures.

Key Financial Regulations

While Dudley did agree that some current regulation warrants adjustment, the key regulations maintaining a healthy financial industry must remain untouched. Among the key financial regulations, he listed standards upholding stronger capital, liquidity, and clearing must be kept in place.

Is 2008 far enough in our rear-view that we’ve already forgotten the same mistakes that brought the financial industry-and U.S. economy-to the brink of collapse? Evidently, it is for banks and policymakers. You have probably been hearing a lot of talk about impending “reviews” of current financial regulation measures; the very regulations put in place immediately following the aftermath of the 2008 collapse; the very measures that are meant to ensure that kind of thing doesn’t happen anymore. However, these calls for review signal a clear intention for some of a desire for wide-scale financial deregulation.

The Push for Financial Deregulation

Financial institutions have claimed that regulation measures have been retaliatory and have largely resulted in stifling growth and ability to offer competitive services and prices. With the introduction of the Trump Administration, financial stocks soared on optimism of a businessman in the White House. The president and other policymakers have repeatedly voice dissatisfaction with current regulatory measures. Notably, the Dodd-Frank law, which provides much of the overarching regulation for banking and finance, has been seen as headed for the chopping block. Reuters reports that in June, House Republicans voted to replace Dodd-Frank.

In a World Without Financial Regulation

The risks of widespread financial deregulation are great. The fallout of 2007-2009 were universal, and effectively ended the popular “too big to fail” concept. Entire companies were brought down, not to mention the homes and savings of thousands of people and families. You probably know someone who experienced financial devastation. Dodd-Frank and other regulatory measures were put in place to ensure that devastation of the magnitude never occur again. While a review of some measures may be warranted, massive financial deregulation is not. In fact, banking experts are warning that a move like that could have dire consequences. Vice Federal Reserve Chair, Stanley Fischer, recently stated that the decision to roll back key elements of Dodd-Frank were extremely short-sighted. He warned that a reversal could be taking us in a very dangerous direction. Regardless of political preference, nobody wants a return to the dark days of 2008. Any “reviews” of existing regulations should be met with apprehension and should be given full deliberation.

Resources

You can read more about the Fed’s concern over deregulation here. Curious about what potential rollbacks could mean for your retirement savings or investments? Give us a call.